Elixir of Indian Economy

 

 

It is a known fact that India is fundamentally an agrarian country. Almost 58% of the Indian population is entirely dependent upon the Agricultural sector for their livelihood, with 120 million farming households (small/marginal) contributing almost 17% to India’s GDP. The highlight of our agricultural sector is mainly milk, pulses, and jute, which we are obviously producing in the highest volume in the world. We are also the second-largest producer/exporter of wheat, rice, cotton, sugarcane, groundnut, vegetables & fruits. India also boasts of leading the production of spices, fish, poultry, livestock, and plantation crops. Currently, with worth $ 2.8 trillion, India is the world's fifth powerful economy after the US, China, Japan, and Germany.

 

But the sad fact is that the Agricultural sector is also one of the most ignored sectors in India Economy at this point in time. The farmers all over the nation are not happy with the new farm law that has been introduced by the centre. We also cannot refrain the fact that while reaching food sufficiency in production, India still holds major drawbacks in agricultural policy, its strategies, implementation & conscious sustainability. Indian agricultural sector is plagued by several chronic issues; some of them are natural and some others are manmade. Some of the major problems are:

 

• The stagnant yield per hectare is disrupting India’s growing needs. To achieve the government’s aim of doubling farmer’s income in the next five years, the net yield must escalate substantially. 
• Enormous disengagement between farm and market. We can often see the availability of excess buffer stocks of farm produce in the warehouses, while the consumers face a scarcity of staple commodities like onions in the market. The marketing policy of agricultural products is apparently flawed because we can see the lack of sync between agro-based industrial interests, farming reforms, and political will. 
• Lack of political initiative to address the alarming ecological challenges like the declining water table, excessive influx of pesticide, and increasing soil erosion.
• The financial distress of farmers; because the selling price of their agricultural produces does not compliment the sector’s increasing requirements for investment. Their shrinking per-capital land holding share with each successive generation is resulting in added exacerbation of the situation. 
• Insufficient & non-existing rural infrastructure such as cold storage, warehousing facilities, and processing units, results in an increased gap between rural produce and urban consumer’s table, resulting in wastage.

 

None of these farm issues are addressed by the new farm law (introduced in 2020). The above challenges have built up gradually over the past decades & the government has not yet introduced a convincing initiative that will strengthen the idea of an empowered agrarian nation & a welfare state. This is why there is a stringent need to amend the Indian farm policy. But what we are lacking here is the rights & consent of farmers who are the main protagonists in the process of farm law and also mainly because their lives & livelihood will be directly affected in a long run. The exigency of reforms in the agriculture sector is more overdue as existing laws kept the Indian farmers enslaved to the wholesale market & their obligation for rent-seeking intermediaries. 

 

Many of the small, medium & large-scale industries in India are directly & indirectly dependent upon agricultural output. The agro-based industries use agricultural products (output from food & non-food crops) as their primary raw materials. These industries range from extremely vast textile industries, food industries, dairy industries, paper industries, pharmaceutical companies, and many more. Further, there are many secondary industries as well that are greatly dependent upon agro-based products for their operation & output. 

Indian Economy is like a giant tree and agriculture represents its fundamental roots. The branches are primary industries and the sub-branches are secondary industries that depend upon produces from primary industries. Agriculture as a root of the Indian Economy plays a great role to determine the quality of fruit that is the GDP of the nation. There is a matter of grave concern as the majority of Indians are still practicing farming & its allied activities but still, the government is not able to secure & implement the interests of farmers. If farmers are not content with what the government has to offer & what the SC appointed “four-member committee” has expressed to support the contentious law, then the need of the hour is to understand what the leaders of the farm law protest wants, to resolve the deadlock between centre & farm union. 

The spoken & written support of the four-member committee of farm law has made many people question the impartiality of the committee & their sanity towards the farmer’s community. Many people who are been opposing this farm bill are been saying that all four committee members are regular “known supporters of the government’s policies”. 

 

We cannot take people for granted with whose efforts we get food in our plate and we cannot take the industry for granted whose contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) has reached almost 20 percent for the first time in the last 17 years, making it a highlight in GDP performance during 2020-21, according to the Economic Survey 2020-2021. The agricultural sector in India is something whose miseries will adversely & directly affect not only the people who are engaged/dependent upon the agricultural sector but also every single household & every single layman because food is our primary necessity, we need it every day to survive. 

 

It will not be wrong to say Agriculture- an Elixir of Indian Economy, being a sovereign sector that not only feeds the people of this nation but also holds a great scope to redefine the GDP & nation’s economy. 

 

 

 

 

North East India & National Register of Citizens (NRC)

The Seven sister & one brother is not only geographically connected with each other but also shares a bond of friendship from ages.

NE region of India is extremely vulnerable & sensitive when it comes to border security. And in context of NRC, saving the rights of inherent north-east Indians it is extremely significant to curb & keep in check the tresspassing of illegal migrants that are coming from the international borders.

North Easts India's international borders are limited to Bhutan in the northwest,  with Bangladesh to the southwest, China to the north west & Nepal to the north west. Particularly the illegal immigrants are evidently in-fluxed from Bangladesh region. Without the concept of NRC the jobs, business opportunities & service sector will be taken over by the in-fluxed & unregistered illegal migrants, which will diminish the scope of employment in the various regions of NE India.

Further, these immigrants are been slowly moving towards other parts of states, in search of employment & better livelihood. It has also been aired in national media that some Bangladeshi terror organisations are also spreading their wings in parts of India. Hence, NRC has great role to play in order to restrain these potential threat entering into the state Assam & other part of NE India.

Entrance of illegal immigrants through Assam means a “Door” open for economic instability & terror to other parts of NE India. Therefore, Yes, it is obvious for North East Indians to greatly supports the concept & implementation of NRC in Assam.

Unsent letters-1

Dear women,

Fractured Legacy

Nell Harper Lee (1926-2016), the author of one of the bestselling books “To Kill a Mockingbird” will always be remembered & celebrated by people who love the magic of the written word. 

It is obvious if asked any lover of English fiction to name their favorite books and it is a no-brainer that To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper lee will feature certainly on the top of that list. It is a book that speaks volume no matter how many times one reads it. Its themes have never really gone away, whether we are talking of America, where unarmed black teenagers continue to be shot dead, or of India, where students like Rohith Vemula are forced to take their own lives. And considering the recent events in Delhi’s Patiala House courts, one might even wonder whether it should be made required reading in law schools across the country.

Harper Lee’s fame chiefly rests on her first novel, which would also have been her last but for the publication of Go Set a Watchman in 2015. Its publication generated much controversy and the novel itself marked a radical break with its precursor in such significant ways that it led some people to conclude that the legacy of Mockingbird and Harper Lee’s reputation itself had been tarnished.

Nell  Harper Lee was born on April 28, 1926, in Monroeville, Alabama, as the youngest of four children. Her father, Amasa Coleman  was a lawyer with the firm Barnett, Bugg & Lee. Her mother was living with a severe mental illness, and it was said that she tried to drown Harper Lee twice in the bath. The tomboyish Harper Lee and Truman Capote (a writer and Harper’s childhood friend) would spend time together reading and inventing stories. Harper Lee’s father presented her an Underwood typewriter, which accompanied her everywhere she resided. Capote appears in Mockingbird as the precocious Dill Harris. He returned the favour by modelling the character of Idabel Tompkins in his novel Other Voices, Other Rooms on Harper Lee.

After graduating from high school (1944), Harper attended the girls’s Huntingdon College in Montgomery. She later switched to the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa. She was a regular contributor to the university’s newspaper and its humor magazine. This provided her the credential to become the editor of the magazine.

Soon she realized that writing was her true calling. She went to New York and ran into her old friend Capote, who was already recognized as a promising writer. Harper Lee started working on her novel, which was eventually published in July 1960 with the title To Kill a Mockingbird. It was picked up by the Book-of-the-Month Club and the Literary Guild and in 1961 won the prestigious Pulitzer Prize.

The novel was inspired by an incident that occurred in Harper Lee’s hometown in 1933. A black man was convicted of rape, but his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment. Harper Lee’s father had been instrumental in getting the death sentence commuted. It was his first and last criminal case. Yet another inspiration would have been the Scottsboro case of 1931 in which nine black teenagers were accused of the rape of two white girls.

Surprisingly, despite its popularity, there have been demands to ban the novel in school libraries. African-American parents in Oklahoma had problems with the use of the word “nigger”, and the school board had to remove the book from reading lists. In Hanover county, Virginia, it was banned along with books such as The Wizard of Oz and Rebecca of Sunny brook Farm.

After she finished the novel, she received an invitation from Capote to assist him on his book to be based on the story of a murdered Kansas family, the Clutters. Harper Lee assumed the roles of secretary, interviewer and go-between for Capote. The book was Capote’s 1966 bestseller, In Cold Blood. Harper Lee accompanied Capote to Holcomb, Kansas, when he went there to do some research on the murders. Her presence helped him to win the confidence of Midwesterner, who were not too comfortable with his city slicker ways.

Two years after Mockingbird was published, it was shown into a movie starring Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch and directed by Robert Mulligan. To date, it is considered one of the best movie adaptations of a book. The movie was nominated for eight Academy Awards and ended up winning three, including Best Actor for Gregory Peck. 

In November 2007, President George W. Bush presented Harper Lee with the Presidential Medal of Freedom for her “outstanding contribution to America’s literary tradition”.  

First manuscript

Watchman was actually the first manuscript she had submitted to her publisher, in 1957. In it, the characters who appear in Mockingbird are adults. But the editor asked her to revise the story making a child, Scout, the central character. The revision took two years and resulted in Mockingbird.

Harper Lee died on February 19, 2016 at the age of 89.

With the runaway success of Mockingbird, readers expected Harper Lee to churn out more novels but were disappointed when she went into hibernation. When one of her cousins, Richard Williams, asked her why she never wrote another book, she answered: “When you have a hit like that, you can’t go anywhere but down.” Her words may have been prophetic, going by the reactions to her second novel. Mockingbird is a literary classic. It explores issues such as racism and prejudice in small-town Alabama but is also a coming-of-age novel that dealt with themes such as the loss of childhood innocence. Harper Lee’s biographer Charles J. Shields calls it the “Huckleberry Finn of the 20th century”. Scout is part of a very American tradition of young narrators such as Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn who expose the faults and foibles of adults with a clear eye. And Atticus Finch is the father everyone longs to have: wise, principled, idealistic, humane, compassionate and fair-minded. After the novel was published, people named their children after him or decided to become lawyers, such was the cachet the character enjoyed. The book is also a veritable treasure house of eminently quotable quotes. Sample the ones below:

“You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view.... Until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it.”

“The one thing that doesn’t abide by majority rule is a person’s conscience.”

“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of [another].... There are just some kinds of men who—who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.”

Widely criticized

Although Watchman also became a bestseller, it was widely criticized. The novel upends the feel-good vibes of the earlier book by revealing that the honorable Atticus is actually a bigoted racist with ties to the dreaded Ku Klux Klan.

In the novel, the 26-year-old Scout returns home to Maycomb, Alabama, from New York City and is stunned to discover that her father, her hero and idol, and her long-time boyfriend have crossed over to the opposite camp. Like Scout, the reader is also shocked when Atticus asks his daughter: “Do you want Negroes by the carload in our schools and churches and theatres? Do you want them in our world?” For many readers and fans of the earlier novel, it was as if Harper Lee had betrayed them. They would now have to revisit the novel and the character of Atticus and see them with new eyes.

While some academics saw in it an opportunity to re-examine white liberalism in literature, many critics felt that it was a much inferior novel in terms of style and content. Others denounced its racial politics. Natasha Tretheway, a former poet laureate, feels that the second book is “deeply flawed” and yet timely and important because it reveals that “a person can be noble and justice-seeking, but at the same time maintain these deeply ingrained ideas of racial difference and want to maintain the status quo”. She argues that the novel gains more significance “in terms of her larger legacy”.

One critic describes it as “a book of enormous literary interest, and questionable literary merit”. The literary interest probably has more to do with the curious history of the work itself—an original story which was given a quiet burial only to be given a new lease of life five decades later. It baffled both readers and other writers because of its portrayal of Atticus, who transmogrifies from a much-loved character in the first novel into a reviled one in the second. There are authorial hints about changing times and the polarization caused by the civil rights movement to explain the toxic mutation that Atticus undergoes. Another plausible explanation could be that fictional characters also evolve, the way human beings do in real life. One is reminded of Robert Frost’s lines: “I never dared be radical when young/ For fear it would make me conservative when old.”

Like J.D. Salinger, Harper Lee rarely gave interviews. In a private conversation with Oprah Winfrey, she once compared herself to Boo Radley, the shy recluse in her first novel. While writing Mockingbird, her intent was to chronicle something that was vanishing rapidly, small-town, middle-class Southern life. “There is something universal in it; something decent to be said for it and something to lament, once it goes, in its passing. In other words, all I want to be is the Jane Austen of south Alabama,” she declared in a 1964 interview.

Harper Lee may have left behind a fractured legacy, but the “mockingbird” will continue to sing its haunting melody as long as there are people who love the magic of the written word and believe in its redemptive and healing powers.